I have grown up understanding the description of Jesus as the good shepherd to be full of agricultural symbolism. We hear the term in so many Biblical passages:
John 10:11 (ESV): 11 I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
John 10:14 (ESV): I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me,
Psalm 23:1–2 (ESV): The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
2 He makes me lie down in green pastures.
The imagery usually includes Jesus as the shepherd, Jesus’ followers as sheep, and the setting is usually fields or pasture. Lurking danger is often depicted as animals of prey, or the sheep’s only folly by wandering off into wilderness. The meaning is clear and understandable. Jesus takes care of us by nourishing us and protecting us. Going outside of his will and boundary will end us in trouble. The imagery also includes him stepping out of the fold to find us when we have got ourselves lost.
A couple of times recently, I’ve come across an extra layer of meaning that would have been understood by ancient readers of Biblical texts but seems to have been forgotten by the modern world - at the very least it is rarely discussed as part of the term’s meaning. This meaning is that the term ‘good shepherd’ was often a euphemism for a king in the ancient Near East.
Ben Witherington III writes in Jesus the Seer: The Progress of Prophecy, that,
It can not be stressed enough that in the ancient Near East it was precisely by the constructing of cities and temples that a king became the organiser, protector, and controller of a country, it’s people, and it’s political and religious life. The ‘Good Shepherd’ as such ancient kings were called, was at once chief executive, high priest, supreme commander of the army, and supreme-court judge all rolled into one. The city of a great king had a cosmological aspect - it became the abode of the god. (Ch 3 Courting the Prophets, 68)
Later in the chapter, he refers to the story of King Ahab in 1 Kings 22:1-40 who has sought his court prophets out in order to find a positive prediction for his future. Micaiah is brought in. When he is sworn to speak the truth,
he tells a tale of all Israel scattered upon the mountains by their foes and leaderless, like sheep without a shepherd, and their having nothing to do but wander home. Since the term ‘shepherd’ was a not uncommon euphemism for the king in the ancient Near East (see, E.g. Zechariah 13:7), the implications of the oracle are clearly bad for the king.
Looking at all Jesus’ self-references as the good shepherd throughout the gospels takes a deeper level of meaning. Now, I have to get my head around not just agricultural symbolism, but the significance of a great royal ruler overseeing a nation. The inhabitants of any powerful city rely on the king for protection and provision, just as a farming shepherd would also do for his sheep, except this time the significance is far greater.
It suddenly makes Jesus’ claims to divinity throughout the gospels take on more weight, and I feel that this can be missed quite often in the modern culture.
Are others aware of this meaning, and has it affected your understanding of all Jesus’ self-references as a shepherd in the Gospels?