As I was talking with a Spiritist at a recent event, he shared his beliefs about reincarnation with me.
(In another post, I started a discussion on the question, Does Jesus Teach Reincarnation?).
One aspect of reincarnation that I have struggled to understand is how it changes our attitude toward those who suffer.
So I gently asked him, do you think that poor people or disabled people are getting what they deserve?
He became very animated and said, 'Yes, absolutely. If you do not have a hand, it is because you misused it in a previous life! The poor are suffering because they were very selfish and greedy with their money in an earlier life. Now they get what they deserve!"
I wasnāt sure what else to ask at this point, so I said, āCan you explain more?ā
Iām glad I did because he then explained how reincarnation motivates living ethically.
For instance, if you are convinced that using your hands for evil could mean that you are reborn without hands, it provides a very strong incentive not to misuse your hands!
One commonality I note between his point of view and mine is that we are both trying to answer the questions: Why is there suffering? and Why be good?
I happened to discuss this conversation with @alison, and she pointed out how it can feel better to have a clear answer to those questions, even if it is harsh, than to live in the mystery of not knowing why there is suffering or how being good works out.
When I was talking with the Spiritist, I shared with him that I believed God was far more merciful than the punitive approach of reincarnation. I said that I believed God made every person in his image, and he cared for us in our suffering. Rather than blaming us for our troubles, Jesus came to rescue us - both our sin, of course, but also our suffering.
I said that from my perspective, Christianity motivates me to be good because this is how I become whole and complete as a follower of Christ, and this includes relieving suffering.
However, one story from Jesusā life that I wish Iād had in mind for this conversation is from John 9:1-5. We read,
As Jesus was passing by, he saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, āRabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?ā
"Neither this man nor his parents sinned,ā Jesus answered. āThis came about so that Godās works might be displayed in him. We must do the works of him who sent me while it is day. Night is coming when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.ā
Itās revealing that the disciples also wonder who to blame for the manās blindness: do they blame the blind man or his parents?
But Jesus is quite authoritative - and gripping - as he totally denies this interpretation.
J. Ramsey Michaels explains,
The blindness of this man, Jesus says, is not the result of someoneās sin but the occasion for Godās work in his life to be displayed. Like the person mentioned in 3:21 who ācomes into the light,ā the man born blind will demonstrate in his experience that he is Godās child. In coming (literally) from darkness to light, he is born again. His story is the case history of a Christian convert. At the beginning he is a beggar and an outcast in the old community of Judaism, and at the end he is a worshiper of Jesus (v. 38).
How remarkable! Jesus is so unusual. Where others see a blind man deserving condemnation, Jesus sees someone to heal and befriend.
Iām curious: How do you evaluate the ājusticeā of reincarnation? In what ways does believing in reincarnation āhelpā people? And in what ways is it a flawed understanding?